Score Sites the Way Your Strategy Says To
Different deals weigh different things. MyDealTeams lets you define scoring criteria, set weights, score every candidate, and see the ranking — visually — so the decision rationale is always defensible.
Why Site Scoring Is Usually a Black Box
Most scoring lives in someone's spreadsheet that nobody can replicate.
Criteria invented per deal
No two evaluations score the same way — leadership can't compare across deals.
Weights lost in formulas
The 'why' behind the weighting disappears the moment the analyst moves on.
Scores stale before review
By the time the committee meets, the underlying data has changed and the scores haven't.
What MyDealTeams Does
Scoring becomes a transparent, repeatable part of the evaluation.
Reusable criteria templates
Define scoring criteria once, reuse across evaluations.
Weighted scoring
Set criterion weights to reflect strategy — adjust per evaluation when needed.
Per-site scoring
Score each candidate against the same criteria with notes for context.
Visualization
Bar, radar, and ranking views show the relative strength of every site.
Defensible decisions
Every score has an author, timestamp, and notes — perfect for committee review.
Score history
Re-score as new data arrives. The history is preserved.
How Teams Use It
Strategy-aligned scoring
Translate "we want trade areas like X" into actual scoring weights.
Committee-ready packets
Generate visual rankings that hold up in real estate committee.
Cross-evaluation benchmarking
Compare how sites score across evaluations to spot pattern shifts.